Posts from the ‘South Australia’ Category

2008 The Family Tree Shiraz, Lambert Estate – what im drinking at the time 11.04.13

Hey guys, today we are back to Adelaide tasting a little Shiraz from Lambert Estate “The Family Tree” Barossa Valley. Lambert Estate wines (previously Stanley Lambert Wines) are very hard to come by produced in small volumes and usually exported overseas. This bottle happens to be 1 of 5,888! The Family three Shiraz is a big rich style wine selecting fruit at optimum ripeness and matured in American oak Hogshead for 12 to 15 months.

2008 The Family Tree Shiraz, Lambert Estate

2008 The Family Tree Shiraz, Lambert Estate
Individual Vineyard, Barossa

Read more…

Lindemans Pyrus Coonawarra Trio 2006 – what i’m drinking at the time

Hey guys!

It’s Kenny here bring you your weekly hit of wine crazy. Today I get to introduce you all to the Linderman’s Pryus Coonawarra Trio.

Lindemans Pyrus Coonawarra Trio 2006

Read more…

Henschke Keyneton Euphonium 2008 – what i’m drinking at the time 28.03.12

Good day everyone! Been a bit of a gap between posts of late but looking to change that. I have been hella busy so tonight I was lucky enough to snuggle up to this sexy looking bottle.

Henschke Keyneton Euphonium 2008

Read more…

Saltram No 1 Shiraz 2005 – What i’m drinking at the time 11.01.2012

Good evening everybody, hope you’re all doing well! Today my parents came home from their holiday so Nat and I invited the in-laws and them over for a nice dinner. Naturally, wine was to be had. I know they like their oaky new world styles so I pulled out this guy.

Saltram No 1 Barossa Shiraz 2005

Wow would ya look at all them shiny gold medals. These guys are good in providing information so you can find most of what you want here. Lowdown is that these guys are from Barossa and No. 1 is their first label started in 1859. The grapes are 90% Barossa, 10% Eden Valley and 14.5% so expect big flavours.

I bought this guy a while back before I got into this wine craze. Back in the day I bought a 2000 vintage of this for a friend’s birthday present. We drank it together 10 years later and from memory it was lovely.  Quick vintage check shows the 05 to be a very very good year and much better than the 00, though it may be still a bit young and tannic. My personal scribbles says that I should keep this till around 2015. Couldn’t wait that long so I made sure to decant this for a bit. I put it in a wide based decanter for about 1.5-2 hours and it sat in the glass for about 30 mins before anyone had a go at it so it felt ok.

The smell on this guy when I poured in into the decanter filled the room of Ribena, it was so fruity. Ok, lets dive in.

The nose had big “in your face” black berries. Some bitter dark chocolate notes followed by some sweet american oak and a tinny touch of barnyard smells and cashew nuts.

Attack is all vanilla and berries and red plums, basically typical barossan big fruit punch with a lean clean mouthfeel. Fruit gets overtaken by some bitter tannins in the mid palate which transitions in to a sharp acidity. They then mix together and you get a ginseng kind of flavour and effect with splash of bitterness from the tannins and a grippy mouthfeel. The finish is long but has some alcohol heat and it leaves you with a tingling on your tongue.

I was left a bit unimpressed, doesn’t seem young but perhaps hasn’t settled down or something. The balance is not there, very one dimensional flavours and straightforward (perhaps a bit boring?). There are accented fruit flavours but then there has to be an equal accented acidity and tannins which I don’t get. The bitterness is very noticeable and unpleasant. Not what I expected for $50. I wasn’t the only one who was disappointed. The table found similar faults in the wine, some liking the finish, some liking the start but mostly commented on its bitterness.

I left it in the glass for about another hour. The acidity and tannins blended together a better and it develops some vanilla spices but there is still a bit of heat at the finish. Still not great. In addition to all this, I tasted it out of 2 different glasses: Riedel Shiraz and Riedel “all-purpose” kind of glass. It’s startling how different drinking a Shiraz from a Riedel Shiraz glass is. I was kinda floored on how much more open the nose is and how the flavours were more pronounced. If you get a chance, try Riedel vs another glass, its crazy man.

So, final thoughts on the wine? If you do a quick google search, you will get rave reviews on this wine with very high scores. The tasting notes were similar in flavours but not in the level of complexity especially when you take into account when they tasted it vs now. Perhaps it needed longer in the decanter, or perhaps it was my particular bottle which was defunked (side note, it was screw top! no cork for my cork collection!). I don’t know. What I can say is, be sure to not just trust rating points or other people’s reviews, use them as guides. i’m pretty sure that when I bought this, I read somewhere that it was the nuts so I bought it at a relatively cheap price for its scores. Nope. Trust yourself and try it yourself.

Happy drinking

Kenny

Going blackjack+1, 22 wines – what i’m drinking at the time 17.12.2011

Crazy crazy day today! Almost felt like I was a professional wine taster! Big thank you to Dan Murphies Bulleen to putting on a premium wine tasting session of 19 wines including vertical tastings of Rockford Basket Press, Moss Wood and a Magnum of 10 year old Grange. So pour self a glass, sit back, listen to this can get comfortable cos this is epic.

The world warriors:

Sriyan, Eugene, Michelle, Alex, Simon and Me

The bad boys:

Read more…

Chateau Bellevue 2009 Bordeaux & McWilliams Regional Collection Coonawarra Shiraz 1999 – What i’m drinking at the time 11.12.2011

Continuing the French theme, we got some more Bordeaux today. Presenting….

Chateau Bellevue 2009 Bordeaux

Nat’s parents got this as a present today so lucky us. Retails for around $10, and screw top on a french bottle! Wow, times are changing. Looking at the label, it’s within the same category of wines as I have been drinking recently; the Cheval Noir and the Chateau Haut-Madrac. Randomly going on a running theme here shall we say.  This guy is again a Merlot dominate wine with Cabernet Sauvignon blend and at 13.5% alc./vol. Passed once through an aerator. Shall we taste?

Nose is pretty deep with black fruits, blackberries. A big lush nose with some oak, almost Barossa in style. The attack is lean, medium bodied with a nice mix of acidity and fruit. Lacks structure until it hits the mid palate where the tannins come in to balance out the acid and bring something to the mouthfeel. Finish is dry on the gums and very  long with some lime characteristics and a bit salty. Tastes haps better after more and more time in the glass, less oak and more smooth and fruit. Not much happening here but a nice tasting wine and reminds me of Penfolds bin 28. Initially I thought this was going to be crap but all things considered, I’m kinda impressed given the label. Don’t judge a book by its cover hey? Not a great wine but getter than most standard casual wines, and better than the CHeval Noir and Haut Madrac at a better price point. I would guess that this would be a $20-$25 dollar wine so it’s not without merit.

But wait, there’s more….

Mid writing this review, I had to drop some things off at parents house. My brother and his girlfriend was there and started shouting “Ken’s here! Another reason to open a bottle!” At 11.00pm I thought? You cannot be serious?! Apparently, Pol (brothers girlfriend) came back from her work Christmas function where that had unlimited drinks! (just the nonalcoholic kind…yeah…). My dad scrummaged around so I can’t let my family do all the heavy lifting, if I must I must. So if your still reading, we get a special guest of wine number 2.

McWilliams Regional Collection Coonawarra Shiraz 1999

Got a bit of ages to it too! 13.5% just like the previous. We aerated this into a decanter for about 15 mins? No justice but it was getting late sooo….Lets get right into it!

The nose brought me straight into middle earth (or New Zealand) with green and lush rolling hills. French oak is present with dried cranberries. Some initial sharp sourness made me gasp…hope its not vinegar! Attack is weird. It’s watery, background of tannin, well integrated fruit and acid. Balanced but feels unbalanced. Mid palate is cranberries and no increase or decrease in intensity of flavours from the initial attack. Some burnt wood and pineapple, the bits you get towards the skin. Finish is smooth light tannins, oak comes out to party here with vanilla notes. It’s a long long, very long finish with some apricot flavours you get at the seed, persimmon and leaves you with a very waxy mouth.

This feels like a matured wine, mellow and just chilling out. It has some complexity to it, solid mix of richness, smoothness and fruit flavours but does feel like it’s past its prime and wasn’t intended to taste this way. Bottle notes say its full bodied, cherry, spicy, plum and clove (which you get from the numb wax mouth). The fruit has faded into shadows and the supposed find grained tannins and spicy oak is a ghost. Not a bad effort, but again, nothing to write home about.

Sweet dreams!

Kenny

Frenchy’s Dan Murphy’s Langton’s dinner – 29.11.2011

Greetings All! Last Tuesday Nat and I were invited to a Langtons Classification Fine Wine Dinner semi sponsored by Frenchy’s and Dan Murphy’s Glen Waverley. A special mention to the guys from Wantirna Estate for donating their wines to sweeten the price. A big big thank you to you guys. It was a great night and a huge success.

Frenchy’s Bistro Head Chef Klaus Lemme, Steve Alexander Dan Murphy’s and Wantirna Estate’s Reg Egan

The Langtons classification is a “form guide” of Australia’s best performing and most prized wines based on quality, recognition and markets. The classification is revised every 5 years (currently its 5th Classification) which showcases wines in 4 categories; Exceptional, Outstanding, Excellent and Distinguished. It is arguably the most famous and widely respected wine classification outside of Europe. For more information, visit click here. I felt very lucky to sample some of Australia’s finest.

Wines of the night


Champagne Duperrey

Oysters with cucumber tea granita
Potato pancakes with mandarin vodka-cured Salmon and herb crème fraiche
Sashimi tuna with scorched orange dressing

The night started of swimmingly. As we entered, we were greeted with old friends Mr. Champagne and Mrs. Canapes. Good day to you sir’s, delightful to see you again if I don’t say so myself 🙂 30 people were invited to the dinner and I was easily the youngest and to be honest, I felt a bit out of my depth discussing these wines with experts but the champagne helped quite a bit 😛 Nat was playing with her new lens and was given the “task” of taking some happy snaps of the evening. The canapes were yummo and if they have these on the menu, I would recommend the potato pancakes with the vodka cured salmon. It was off the hook! At 7 we were all to be seated and the fun began.

McWilliams Lovedale Semillon 2005

Tyrrell’s ‘Vat 1’ Semillon 2005

Pickled Bonito with lemon and apple Tuna Tartar with tomato and squid ink Miso rice ball with Blue Swimmer Crab meat

The 1st course paired up two 2005 Hunter Valley NSW Semillon’s both from the Outstanding Classification, same vintage and both screwcap. This would be interesting!

First the McWilliams Lovedale. Sweet, ripe peaches, light fresh syrupy flavours on the nose. Attack is a bit thin but in a good way and the acidity is big on the palate. There are little touches of tannin here and there and the fruit is well integrated but the “hero of the wine” (picture Gary from masterchef here) is the acid. Finishes short and a touch dry. In a nutshell, a very refreshing thirst quencher. The fish is a great match with the wine, it melds and mixes extremely well with the creaminess and oils of the fish. 

Now to the Tyrrell’s. There was a lot of prior talk and praise with this wine and a lot of gold medals on the bottle to match (if your into that sort of thing). Bang! Butter, mineral and oak wafts into every sniff. Deep, complex and layered nose with rock salt components (the kind you get when you order oysters Kilpatrick and they serve it on a tray of rock salts). Very Montrachet like which is lovely and right down my alley. Attack is accented, uplifting and tingly with acidity, less fruit and tannins but well balanced and integrated. Smooth and creamy with a long green apple and grapefruit finish. Food increases the acidity and adds a subtle sweetness.

The food was spectacular. The tuna tartar was very soft and delicate but the main part of the dish for me was the rice ball and the pickled bonito. They were banging with flavours and perfect within the dish and with the wines. I found the Tyrrell’s a more balanced wine and powerful whist the McWilliams is more restrained and elegant and a better food wine for this dish. Both got more mineral and salty components with time.

Pierro Margaret River Chardonnay 2009

Leeuwin ‘Art Series’ Chardonnay 2008

Free range chicken and white asparagus in a light cream of roasted almonds

2nd course was a grudge match between Chardonnay’s from Margaret River WA. The Leeuwin Art Series sits in the Exceptional Classification and is always mentioned in Australian top self Chardonnay. The Pierro is from the Outstanding classification and is a long standing foil to Leeuwin Art Series and very grand cru Burgundian style wine. Both use French oak, malolactic fermentation and long battonage (lees stirring). I think Nat was too excited during this course and missed out on pictures of the chicken! Oh well, lets see how the wines went. Coming into the dinner, this was one of the wine brackets I was excited about.

The Pierro was a very aromatically challenged wine only getting hints of oak but nothing else coming through. Very woody on the attack, almost spicy and chilli in taste which I found strange. Mid palate becomes milder and incorporates more butter and oak nuances. Fruit is all in the background, sitting there looking pretty. Finish is deep, dark and woody and relatively long. A very interesting taste profile from a Chardonnay. It tasted very different with the food, somewhat sweeter. It’s great with the chicken and it rounds out what the wine lacks and brings out more acidity.

Now to the Leeuwin. Milk, cream, custard, mushroom omelette with wafts of duck? Gentle shadows of oak and sweetness. Reminds me of French whites with some brets/barnyard smells. Strange nose indeed. Initial attack is again a bit spicy and pinewood (perhaps some food from the first course is still on my palate? I did have some bread I promise). The was had an almost raw lemon rind and a touch of bitterness. Insanely complex wine with butt loads of mineral and iron ore feelings…think copper? Finish is warm and a bit creamy with some of that lemon rind in there (bitter and acidic, but a nice bitterness). Another interesting wine with lots of grapefruit and lemon components but not as much of the milk and cream you get from the nose and I found this more Burgundian than the Pierro. The food is uplifted with this wine but the finish becomes bland whist highlighting the almost almond puree of the dish. It also develops apple and pear components.

Food was again very good. The dish didn’t look like what I expected; for starters the dish came in a ramekins! There were evenly sliced pieces of chicken brest submerged in a generous serving of almond cream puree and 2 green asparagus. The almond and the chicken was a great match in flavours nad textures whist the asparagus would set you up for the next bite. Yum! The Pierro brings up more sweetness of the dish whist the Leeuwin brings up more savouriness. Amazing.

Both wines are soooo different. The group nutted out that the Perrio was more elegant whist the Leeuwin was more powerful. I’m not sure on either, what I do know is that there is tonnes of complexity and layers in both wines just on different spectrums. Tough to compare, Leeuwin today, tomorrow, who knows! Both are mood wines, thinking wines and food wines. Try them both, I’m very divided though I think I was leaning towards

Coriole ‘Lloyd’ Shiraz 2007

Best’s ‘Bin O’ Shiraz 2009

Rare roasted lightly peppered venison. Savoy cabbage and mangoes

The Shiraz matchup; Coriole ‘Lloyd’ 07 vs the Best’s ‘Bin O’ 09, McLaren Vale SA vs Grampians Vic both in the Excellent Classification and both very traditional classics and old school wines.

First up, Coriole ‘Lloyd’ Shiraz 2007. Big red cherry with a touch of heat. Green nettle and earth flavours…bugs? with some barnyard thrown in here too. That mumbo jumbo probably just means earthy, but that’s what comes into my head sooo yeah. Attack is tannic, acidic and gives you a dry mouth feel. The mid palate is a touch bitter and the fruit comes in at the finish but short lived. A dry and tannic wine, would benefit from some more time sleeping. However the food and wine paired up extremely well. The food made the wine sweeter and more balanced, simmering down the tannins.

Best’s ‘Bin O’ Shiraz 2009 is a few years older but didn’t show its age. Candy, fruit bomb nose wrapped in TV remote control plastic. Add some blueberries and water all that down a bit (came across a bit thin). Hummm…. Attack is a mix of bitter tannins, fruit and spicy apple pie and fairy floss..definately fairy floss without a doubt. Finish is like artificial sweetener, very fruity and spicy caramel pancake flavours with some crispy bacon. Not sure about the quality of this wine, reminds me of a watered down basket press. Food did the opposite to the first wine, brought up the tannins and structure and backbone in the wine.

The food was again, excellent (running theme?) The cabbage for me was the main part of the dish with the venison almost as a side note. The venison brought the texture but the cabbage brought the flavour. The cabbage was savoury and had a soy like sweetness. I looked at the food/wine pairing as cabbage/wine pairing and the Lloyds matched better with this dish hands down. The better wine, I’m not sure which is better. I’m not sure I liked either and I think both improve with different foods; sweeter meats with the Coriole (in this case, cabbage) whist more savoury BBQ meats with Bests. Still, neither wow me all that much.

Wantirna Estate ‘Amelia’ Cabernet/Merlot 2009

Katnook Estate ‘Odyssey’ Cabernet Sauvignon 2005

Slowly cooked ox cheek. Parley coulis, sweetbreads.

This was going to be an uphill battle for the Katnook Estate ‘Odyssey’ as Reg Egan, winemaker of the Wantirna Estate ‘Amelia’ was here to talk and share his knowledge (and to present his fabulous wine today). Not blowing his horn or anything but this is a great wine, personal favourite of the night (at least top 2 or 3). This wine was made in a Medoc style with some added can franc and petit vedot. Excellent, excellent….go on. It had a dry woody strawberry and sour cherry nose with some branches and undergrowth, barky and green flavours. Wine was light bodied, well balanced, and elegant on the attack. In fact, my notes just keep saying well balanced, well balanced, well balanced! A must swallow drop. Berries, touch of dryness and acidity on the mid palate all in perfect harmony. Finish is again a tough dry and long with a hint of heat. Truly impressive, has a maturity to it and the better wine of the bracket. This sits in the Distinguished Classification and the only downside is I found the food brought up some of the alcohol in the wine. Easy fix, I drank this by itself 😛 Best thing about this wine?  Yarra Valley, Victoria, just next to the Glen. I could walk there! Check out the website map.

So, how about the Katnook Estate ‘Odyssey’? This guy sits also in the Distinguished Classification coming from Coonawarra SA. It had a candy nose, viscous, honey, caramel, sweetbreads and cinnamon kind of flavours. Attack is unsurprisingly sweet but sharp, followed by tannins and bacon bits. Transitions into a bit more sweetness on the mid palate but better balanced with the tannins and dryness. Finish is dryer and spicy – sweet white pepper and paprika. Food brings more Asian sweet spices to the wine and I think was a better food match than the Wantirna Amelia. Reminded me of the Best’s ‘Bin O’. I’m not sure about this style of wine, too sweet for my palate and a bit thin but I can see people liking it and obviously they do.

Food wise, I expected the ox cheek to be softer but it was still delicious. I do love me some snails and garlic though! The flavours brought me back to France and reminded me of a slice of Burgundy.

Cullen ‘Diana Madeline’ Cabernet Merlot 2009

Moss Wood Cabernet Sauvignon 2008

Tournedo of spring lamb with cannelloni of braised lamb neck. Swiss chard and water cress.

The 5th course was the big one. Two classified Exceptional wines from  Margaret River WA.

The Cullen ‘Diana Madeline’. One of Australia’s greatest cabernets with small portion of Cab Franc (dense and sweet), Malbec (spicy and rich) and Petit verdot (deep concentrated and liquorice). Planted in 1971 on ancient granitic soils and practices biodynamic viticulture to “achieve greater individuality of site by working with and not against nature”. Hand picked, 10-50% is barrel fermented, rest is further matured in 30% new French oak. Just had this recently (see my previous posts?) so I know it’s going to be a bomb! Great toffee and green bramble notes and earthy tones. Attack is a touch of acid with the fruit coming in and out of. Superb balance with an acid backbone and subtle tannins. Finish is long, smooth and rounded mouthfeel, again, perfect balance and long lasting. No unpleasantness whatsoever. Nothing to complain about (besides the price :P) A close close second for the wine of the night, or maybe not, I dunno, I have to try them again.

Moss Wood Cabernet Sauvignon 2008. One of the choicest and beautiful vineyard sites in Australia and makes one of the pinnacle cab savs in Australia. Unirrigated and widely spaced on NE slopes with sandy loams and gravelly red/brown loams over clay. Big on terrior and sustainable viticulture but not fully biodynamic. Also adds cab franc, petit verdot and merlot and longer skin contact during ferment. De stemmed into open tanks and hand plunged 4 times a day and 24 months French oak aging. Another bad boy I was looking forward to try. Vanilla and sweet oak wood notes on the nose. Attack is mellow at first,  then sharp and acidic and complemented well with vanilla a fruit flavours. A more accented and up front wine than the Cullen but still very laid back in style. Finish continues to be mellow with some acidity and lemon rind creating a smoothness but some edge.

Both are so so layered and complex. Cullen is more pleasant to drink, moss wood has slightly higher heat aspect. The Cullen is more acidic and the moss wood is, well, woodyer and earthy. The Cullen is more elegant, softer, moss wood is more powerful but gentle at the same some. I’m just splitting hairs here, they are both very special wines, sensational and just kick ass. Moss wood rounds out my top 3 wines of the night.

The dish with these wines was lamb which was a bit tough and lemony. Both wines matched in different ways, Cullen was more integrated with the taste of the food whist the moss wood lifted and accented the food. In any case, the lamb played a second fiddle to the wines.

 De Bortoli ‘Noble One’

Shadows of Blue caramelized pear
Toasted ginger bread.

Dessert! De Bortoli ‘Noble One’, from the Outstanding Classification is made from Botrytis Semillion in Riverina NSW. This is the benchmark of Australian dessert wines. Ok so I’m pretty sure I was drunk at this point. How do I know? For starters, after visiting the little boy’s room, I thought I was locked out of the restaurant. I was pushing and pulling at the door trying to get in only to find that it was a sliding door. Next, Nat tells me that she may have seen me drifting in and out of sleep or something (thank god I’m asian hey?) but the funniest part was I found two sets of tasting notes! Let’s just say I was being thorough shall we?

Notes 1: Citrus notes, extremely fresh, ginger with pears. Not very viscous, not too sweet. Thin and crisp. The blue cheese and pear matches with the wine very well, very sublime and exquisite. Also goes nicely with just the toasted ginger bread.

Notes 2: Beautiful sweetness, pear and savoury notes. Not viscous, nice balance of sweet and sour. Long finish of figs and orange peel and lovely match with the food especially with the blue cheese and pear.

So they’re kinda the same but you get the picture 🙂 In any case, it was a great desert wine which is hard to find for my palate.

All in all a wonderful night. I met lots of like minded people and made new friends! Got some numbers too (hehe) and invites to other food and wine parties which I can’t say I mind. Hope you enjoyed my wine escapades.

Until next time

Kenny

Frenchy's Bistro on Urbanspoon

Thomas Hardy Cabernet Sauvingnon 2006 – What i’m drinking at the time – 23.11.2011

It’s Wednesday, and you know what that means, vino! Today we get to sample a Thoman Hardy from the Coonawarra Adelaide Hills areas.

Nice packaging, 13.5% alcohol and a coonawarra cab sav makes for some high expectations. This guy retails for about $100 bucks so lets hope it delivers!

Typical cab nose, red fruits, sour cherry and strawberry, maybe some blackcurrent? Some notes of lush green leaves, i’m thinking holly and some hints of kiwi fruit skin. There is also a sandy grainy aspect to this nose and makes you think of undergrowth.

Attack is somewhat bitter and takes it time to subside and mellow out. The fruit is not upfront, very much in the backgroung. The midpalate does spike in terms of fruit intensity but it’s short lived. Flows into a very tight but not omnipresent mix of tannin and acidity. Tannins definately kick in at the finish, the sides of your tongue and top gums are very grippy and there is a gravel, concrete mouthfeel, dusty dull and blunt finish. Tobacco bits thrown in the mix too with a sprinkle of acidity here and there as your mouth regains moisture. Extremely long finish with little to no heat and makes you want that next mouth full. Somewhat balanced (touch too much tannin) but I dont think its ready for drinking yet. The bottle says celler for 5-20 years and i’m inclined to say hold for at least another 5-7 years. As you drink the wine over time, it definately improves and more complexity and flavours come into play with more fruit forward flavours.

At $100 bucks a bottle, a soild wine especially for cellaring so not great for immediate gratification. I would spend money on some other wines at this price point but I can see others who enjoy this kind of profile easily spashing out on this.

Recommended for some, but as always make your own opinion and try try try!

Kenny

Circa – what i’m eating at the time 18.11.11

 
Friend of mine Eugene booked us a table at Circa in St Kilda last Friday and I was really looking forward to some good food, good wine and good company! His friend’s husband is the sommiler there so I was also hoping to pick brains. Nat, Eugene and I got there way way early so we decided to grab some bar snacks and something to drink; I packed in the water since I was feeling exhausted and wanted to make sure I didn’t pass out mid way through dinner (hey, it has happened before!)

We ended up getting some king prawns with green tea salt and saffron and mozzarella arancini. The arancini balls were meh, but the prawns were D-E-L-I-C-I-O-U-S! I picked at the salt flakes whist I drooled over the crazy wine list. make sure to have a look, there are some great stuff there. We hung around till 7.30 and then food team was assembled and ordered 1 a la carte and 4 degustations (of course) with matching wines. We had a choice of standard or premium wines and when premium…of course 😛 On to the rounds!

Warm miso glazed eel, pickled kohlrabi, avocado & apple

Vinoptima Ormond Gewurztraminer, 2006

Round one is a lovely glazed eel which was tougher than expected, however worked extremely well with the avocado puree and prawn cracker and this highly prized NZ Gewurztraminer was it’s white on rice. Nose was of creamy pear, like a full bodied cider withough the fizz. It matched the food perfectly, to the point that it seemed to be an extension of the food. The wine felt like the texture of the avocado puree and the eel was perfectly coated and finished off with a well rounded mouth feel. Best food and wine pairing of the night, but only just. A great start to the evening.

 Rabbit tortellini, morels, broad beans, garden peas

Bouchard Corton Charlemagne, 2000

If your a wine lover, you got to be excited about round two’s wine, a Corton Charlemagne. Oh and yeah, lets just throw 10+ years on that. What a treat. Such as exciting wine. White peach, mineral notes with some sea salts. The palate was granny smith apples, grass and straw. Odd, I expected more from this wine. However, add this to the food and BAM, imcredible. The food and the wine both bounced off wach other enhancing all the flavours, especially the jerusalem artichoke puree. The nose changed giving off a toffee/caramel aspect especially in the finish. The meal was not to be outshined and was personally my pick for the meal of the night. Delicate pasta and chunks of rabbit with an amazing sauce. A very close second/third in terms of wine pairing but will not complain, hell, I’m asking for seconds!

John Dory, mussel & clam risotto, sea urchin butter

Foster e Rocco Rosé 2010

Round three came with a rose from Heathcote made from 100% mourvedre which I thought was stange. Looking at the colour, you would not pick it to be rose, it had a strange golden/bark colour, almost like a sweet wine, nice and golden. Nose was extremely fresh and floral like potpourri. Beautiful acidity, subtle bitterness, some fruit balance. Reminiscent of a sav blanc. The fish was cooked well and the risotto was excellent, though I’m not sure it was regular risotto. It was almost like a fat sago, very smooth and almost bouncy. I liked it and the sea utchin butter was plate licking good. There was a downside to this dish, the food gave or enhanced a bitter finish to the wine. The wine did do a good job of cleansing the palate reading your mouth for the next bite, but you had a bitter taste in your mouth mading the wine not as enjoyable. We were able to snag another splash from our sommiler! I asked her about the pairing and she said it was more of a textural match and to also prepare your mouth for the red wines to come. After drinking the extra glass by itself, I think it got better over time, but matching the fish? I’m not so sure. Slightly dissapointed but we did come from a major high.

Suckling pig, salsify & ham beignet, spring garlic

Felton Road Cornish Point Noir, 2010

Another NZ wine, this time from Central Otago. This pinot had a great nose of red berries, cassis, brambles, and makes you think of dry and arid bushes. Palate has some white pepper balanced with some sweet Asian spices, cinnamon and paprika. Light to medium bodied, some enjoyable heat on back end but again, well balanced with a touch of acid. Nice wine! The pork belly was solid, though nothing special and I wasn’t a fan of the ham beignet, tasted a bit like spam! Perhaps we were spoilt with the previous dishes? The pinot did a great job of cutting through the fat both on the palate and the taste. Well done and a solid dish, lovely pinot and well matched.

Black Angus rump, bone marrow and oxtail brik, rainbow chard, creamed nettles

Clonakilla Shiraz Viognier, 2010

We drank the 2006 Clonakilla recently and was ranked last stacked against some heavyweight competition. After drinking this wine, it only shows the incredibly high calibre of those other wines. This is a great great wine and well done to such a young winery and vintage. Sniffy sniff opens with oregano, metallic notes and green peppercorns. The viognier comes through well, lifts the wine and brings out some floral sweetness. This wine has a juicy mouth feel, spicy mid palate of white and green pepper. Some caramel nuances also. Finish is a mix of interesting sweet alcohol with a touch of dry of the tip of your tongue, spicy and peperish but extremely well rounded and balanced. This wine matched the dish extremely well, virtually uplifts the entire dish to a new level. Exquisite, just edged out by the first dish, but phenomenal pairing and wine. I believe that the dish was the one playing the role of the backup dancer here and thats saying alot. The steak was excellent and I do love me some bone marrow. I jokingly asked the waiter for a second splash of this like the rose and guess what! I got one! yeah, we tipped 😛

 Salted caramel parfait, chocolate cake, honeycomb

NV Morris Classic Rutherglen Liqueur Tokay

Final round of the night was a treat. The sticky came with smells of honeycomb and port flavours. Not overpowering on the palate like a normal sticky, great mouth feel and balanced sweetness. Very impressive on its own. The dessert was gorgeous, both soft and cruncy and a effortless creamy texture on your mouth. With the dessert, the wine suffered and became overly sweet and somewhat unpleasant. It brought out the alcohol which made me want to finish the desert first then the wine or vice versa. Not a good match but great individually. Sipped that wine throughout the rest of the night with a smile on my face.

Circa was definatly an enjoyable experience. It was strangly loud in the rooms and had very funky ambiance with their own DJ. Very cool. The degustation will set you back $120 and then your choice of standard or premium wines at $85/$120. You will definately sleep well bring a wheelbarrow to roll yourself home.

Kenny

Circa, the Prince on Urbanspoon